Changes to my study program

Hi friends, today I talking about my curriculum map, that is the curriculum map of social anthropology. This map include two parts, the first part belong to basic cycle, this part of map is focused in areas like that basic anthropology and the most important theorists, basic archaeology and his schools, sociology, biology, etc.  But they are subjects that do not serve much for own “academic formation”, for example Linguistic in the thirst semester don’t contribute for own formation, the teacher of the subject is very inefficient, his methodology is basic and his tests are ridiculous, this teacher don’t connect his subject with the career. Principally, the majority of the subjects aren’t reflexive and the knowledge are insufficient for own formation, I think that the two last years are essential because the first years in this career don’t contribute too much.

In the curriculum map don’t including nothing in particular, the problem here are the teachers, that in his majority aren’t contemplate a critical anthropology, something that we don’t have to permit because they are teacher experts in migration, but only dedicate to making papers and treat to immigrant like a study subject and not like person. On the other hand the anthropologist’s experts in the mapuche matter, only extract knowledge’s and not contributes to mapuche cause, because only see in silence the problem and not interfere in this. Although is hard change something I this academic world because his problems only involve his greats egos. Let’s hope this change something in the future.